SAYING GOODBYE TO 2009… AND THIS WILD, CRAZY DECADE, PART 1

December 30, 2009

It’s over.

That’s about all I can or need to say at this point. After all the tributes in newspapers, magazines and URLs to these wild, crazy, ever-changing past ten years, that’s the long, short and middle all wrapped into one.

It’s over.

I’m not entirely sure why I’m writing this big post about the last 10 years of my life. It’s by no means a definitive study of my life. It’s just a small skimming of the surface, but an important one.

These years from 2000 to 2009 have been some of the most exciting and difficult ones of my life. It’s a forgone conclusion that all people change, albeit in mostly subtle ways, over the course of even a few years. To be frank, I can barely recognize myself from January 1st, 2000, up to today. I have changed so much. Maybe that’s why things have been so hard at times for me. Change is incredibly hard at times, and this past decade has a consistently changing one for me. So here’s my attempt to sum it all up. Yet it’s also a chance to do what everyone has to do in their lives: move forward and let go of the past.

****

When I first entered Queen’s back in 1997, I’d be lying if I said I would have expected myself to be where I am today. Back when you’re 19 and arrogantly sure about yourself and the belief that things will work out in a predetermined way, it’s easy to wax philosophical about the future and not concern yourself too much with it. It’s only as you get older, life sometimes gets more confusing and complicated and you discover reasons why even the best people can turn cynical in this world, that you begin to re-examine a lot of things. Your assumptions become as fragile and fragmented as your dreams. You resist looking back on things, because then you have an excuse to not do anything about changing your life circumstances.

Due to my insane memory, I can remember leaving my house that dawn with a friend to go get some millennial newspapers the morning of January 1st, 2000. It was a hazy morning, crispy, crunchy, cold and grey. The world was different in only my mind, I suppose. In the back of my mind, I wasn’t sure if I wanted to go back to Queen’s. The first two and a half years of my time there were harsh, mostly because I wasn’t very good at fitting into things there. I can remember writing emails to groups on campus that sound today like bad teenage poetry. I remember going to campus bars and feeling like I was looking over my shoulder once too often at people I felt could see right through me. My self-esteem was so bad that I threw myself into activities there because it was the only way I felt I would be able to survive Queen’s. I have never been a quitter. I have survived at a lot of things, and I sure as hell wasn’t going to let Queen’s University – a place I had always dreamed about going to as far back as grade eight – ruin things. Besides, I had drinking to do and institutions to ingratiate myself with. Well, what else do people do at university besides learning and surfing the Internet now?

The remainder of that year was an exercise in academic, social and personal survival at Queen’s. Somehow, I managed to get through it all: my odd, ambitious self doing things and saying things I can’t imagine I’d do today. Back then, I’d have hated, or perhaps loathed, a lot of people for their actions towards me. I was a furtively (and often, outwardly) passionate person to the point where I had lost the direction, purpose or meaning of many of my activities on campus. I was still not fulfilling my academic potential, either. This madness went on for a few more years, with some addictions to downloading via Napster and a quiet, first-floor bachelor that was often too cold physically and spiritually along the way.

****


September 11th, 2001.

That day is still very much a turning point for not just every damn thing on this planet, but for one solitary kid in Markham, too. I know that sounds arrogant and incredibly self-possessed, but how do you write about something like 9-11 without relating it to personal experience? This isn’t the pre-Wikipedia age, you don’t need another breathless treatise on that day.

I don’t know exactly how things changed for me, but they did. I felt a lot less arrogant after that. I just feel as if things were profoundly different after that. I definitely was a lot more relaxed in ways that I hadn’t expected.

Robin’s face looked like grief. Geoff – who, for the record, is now a filmmaker in Toronto – had this shocked look on his face. My professor didn’t want to talk about the class that day. It was all 9-11. The rabid history of the moment, feeling like it was telling everyone something secret in the message of two buildings collapse. History’s a cruel mistress.

Diatribe’s first issue came out two weeks after 9-11. It was born in the moment. Chaos and memory, so fluid and ever-changing, like Diatribe and 9-11. I was hellbent on creating the paper for a lot of reasons. I wanted to make the paper for my own voice, and there was a small element of vindictiveness in my heart too. I did want to show a few people that I wasn’t all bluster and actively odd. I wanted to show them all. And I did. A gang of outlaws, misfits and weirdos on campus that did what they had to do.

I had started Diatribe with the gang, my academics were finally at the level they should have been and things were better. I had finally, at least in my own mind, overcome my own self-imposed limitations at the place.

****

It was a chilly April Thursday afternoon. I remember sitting in Stauffer Library’s lobby, looking out onto a deserted intersection at Union and University. I had just been at the Tricolour Award’s nomination party, feeling as if I had a moment to review, in my mind, what the last five years had meant. I had come of age, in that clichéd sense of the term, during a time of change that was so subtle and small that I couldn’t grasp it all. None of it felt real. Queen’s didn’t feel real at times. It was a detached, strange feeling I had. For the first time since I had arrived, I was seemingly at peace with the place.

****

“A man’s attitude defines much of what his life will be.”

It all comes crashing down at some point. Life’s never about a straight line up or down. It’s a parabolic curve. It’s a rollercoaster. Some people get the wilder rides than others. Some people choose that ride. Other people get thrown onto the ride. Some people crash out.

I spent 2003 in a state of perpetual uncertainty. Chaos definitely reigned for much of that year, with a spate of tragedies that made me question a lot of things. Again. Emotionally.

****

It was a cold day in October – a typical kind of day for something that feels like turning the page on things. Fall’s all about things ending, really. Winter’s the real end, but fall’s about coming to terms with it.

October 3rd, 2003.

The tree was planted. The people were there. Her friends. Her family. Professors and our Principal. Eileen was finally laid to rest on campus.

I hadn’t been to her funeral in Fenwick, but this was a close second in emotional intensity. I said goodbye. That was all I needed to say this time. I hadn’t had the chance before.

The days in 2003 were rough. Too many deaths. I can remember sitting in the hospital in Scarborough, my grandmother struggling with her physical decline. My mother made numerous trips back and forth to the hospital to see her mom, almost every day for several straight months. Talk about determination.

I remember crying a lot that year. It was a painful era. A great many personal challenges. Getting stuck in an elevator during the city-wide blackout in Toronto. But I was stronger than I thought.

I worked. I made new friends. I was shedding Queen’s. 2003 was the last year I went back to Queen’s for a non-professional reason. One day I’ll go back for whatever, a Homecoming or something. I will go, though.

****

If I had told you back when I had graduated from Queen’s that I’d be back at school within three years of leaving, I’d have told you that it wasn’t going to happen.

I didn’t want to go back to school at first. The idea of spending time in another university for an extended period of time, at least back in 2004, was not one I wanted to face. I figured with my experience and skills, I was good to go. Well, not really. I did have to go back.

I went out east to Halifax at the University of King’s College. I left my family, friends and girlfriend behind and moved into a house with seven strangers.

Did I like Halifax and King’s? Sure, I did. In many ways, my experiences at King’s were profoundly different from Queen’s, but redemptive of sorts. I worked much harder than I ever did at Queen’s. I became better for it.

Am I proud of everything I did at King’s? Maybe. You always hold onto doubts about yourself and your abilities, no matter where you are at any point in your life. I will probably always question myself and what I’m capable of, in spite of my confidence being light-years ahead of where it was even back in 2004.

Check back tomorrow for the second half.


WINTER OLYMPIC MASCOTS

December 23, 2009

Since I’m going to be covering the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver for Yahoo! Canada, I figure I might as well state for the record that my life is going to be Olympics, 24-7, for three weeks in February. I’m not complaining, though. Ever since the 1984 Los Angeles Summer Games, I’ve been completely enraptured with the Olympics. I’ve worked for two Toronto Olympic bids, watched both Winter and Summer Games obsessively, covered the 2006 Turin Winter Games for AOL and own a pretty hefty number of Olympics books.

Why do I care about the Olympics so damn much? Honestly, I have no idea. It was exciting and formative back in 1988 to see the Games in the proverbial backyard, what with Calgary. Now that I’m older and well aware of all the corruption and bad stuff that goes on at the highest levels of the I.O.C., it’s harder and harder to look at the Olympics as a morally pure, idealistic extravaganza. Of course, as my brother says, it’s also the only time when nationalism is actually cool.

But enough about all that. I’m probably going to blog about the Olympics pretty consistently now up to and including Vancouver. One of the things I admit I like doing about the Olympics is the miscellany that surrounds them, including the mascots. Oh the mascots. The few, the proud, the sometimes-dorky.

1980 – Lake Placid – Roni the Raccoon

What’s the first thing that comes to mind when you think of Adirondack Mountain range? Drunken backwoods huntin’ and killin’? Downhill skiing? The economic wasteland that is Upstate New York? A raccoon? Well, probably not a raccoon. Well, that’s actually what the Lake Placid Olympic Committee chose for its mascot: a creepy-looking raccoon. Check out this comparison:

Now, when you think of Lake Placid, you’ll be thinking of vampires. Stupid Lake Placid.

1984 – Sarajevo – Vučko, the little wolf

Okay, this is a bit better. Still odd, but better than the ultra-creepy Lake Placid mascot, but still not reaching the CuteOverload.com range that future mascots would employ to seduce people into loving the Games. Looks like a European version of Tom from Tom and Jerry, although let’s be honest, the first thought that comes to mind:

ENDUT! HOCH HECH!

1988 – Calgary – Hidy and Howdy, two ridiculously cute polar bears

Alright, now we’re getting somewhere. These adorable late 1980s-looking polar bears showed the world what Canada is all about: soft and cuddly on the outside, hard and cruel as hell to others in reality. Even though polar bears might look cute, they’re actually mean bastards that now eat each other since the polar ice caps have started melting and, you know, caused food supplies to decline to pathetically low proportions.

Still, hats look good. Calgary was still trading in stereotypes as of 1988, anyway.

1992 – Albertville – Magique, the man-star

Holy Christ. This is so lame. Aside from looking like a Coked-out Shriner’s Club Member, this doesn’t even look cute! It’s more scary than anything. I fear the day the French decide to drop thousands of these leftover bad boys onto beaches somewhere in the South Pacific. The French totally dropped the ball.

1994 – Lillehammer – Håkon and Kristin, two humans

Um… okay. See, only in Norway (and possibly Sweden) would this be considered a good idea: two real-life, people that require absolutely no anthropomorphization at all. Lillehammer was easily the best Winter Games ever and the people of Norway got it virtually 100 per cent right, but the mascots are lame. Mega-lame. Thanks for invoking the Olympic spirit, guys. *snark*

1998 – Nagano – The Snowlets – Sukki, Nokki, Lekki and Tsukki

See, I don’t get it. You’d think the Japanese, with their insane and overbearing love of all things cute, would have nailed this one down pat. But they didn’t: instead, they got four “snowlets” that look like they’re about to get run over by a car while tripping out on some really, really strong LSD.

2002 – Salt Lake City – Copper, Powder and Coal, three… um, animals/Earth-bound resources

This is what happens when you have a mascot by committee: you get mascots named after resources. I don’t care if they’re based on the Olympic motto or animals in the Mormon State of Utah. They don’t even look cute. They just seem boring and drab. Wait a minute, the Games were hosted in Utah… it all makes perfect sense.

2006 – Turin – Neve and Gliz – A snowball and ice cube

Alright, much, much better. After several crap-tacular mascots in a row, the Italians got it right. How can you not love Neve and Gliz? They’re unabashedly happy, have huge round faces, and remind people of:

Which brings us to…

2010 – Vancouver – Miga, Quatchi and Mukmuk – Mythical sea bear, sasquatch and Vancouver Island marmot

Yes, they’re adorable. Yes, they’re well-done. Yes, they’re representative of Native Canadian culture on the Left Coast. No way that’s politically motivated. NO. Freaking. WAY.

And yes, they do look like Pokémon.

I’ll do the Summer Olympics mascots soon.


END OF 2009: GREG’S PERSONAL BEST-OF!

December 22, 2009

I’ve been off blogging for a long time now, but I’ve decided to post a few things for the end of this wild and crazy year that 2009 has been. I’m going to post after Christmas my personal favourites in music, movies and TV, as well as my semi-annual “Say Goodbye to” personal year-in-review. Actually, this year’s going to be a decade-in-review for me, and I promise it won’t be full of navel-gazing.

Check back on the weekend. I’m going to have, you know, content, and… stuff!


HEY! YOU’RE BACK! AGAIN!

November 3, 2009

I know, I know.

I’m apparently not a man of my word on this blog.

Truth be told, things have been pretty crazy for me the last little while. My initial idea for reinventing this blog — a regular post on an historical or science-related topic — kind of fell by the wayside, since I realized that there’s a) this little thing called Wikipedia that’s far, far, far better than anything I could ever contribute, and b) I’m not exactly giving it my all on here.

I’m actually mulling over these days a few things: since blogging remains such a vital activity online, how does one define their niche in a sea of them?

I’ve got some things I have to think about still when it comes to writing on here.

MAD MEN: This season has gone by so incredibly fast. I can’t believe the season finale to this wild, crazy third season is next Sunday. I think I fell even more in love with the show this year (if that’s even possible).


A NEW START ON THE BLOG

September 9, 2009

I write on here a lot less often than I used to for a lot of reasons.

Most often, it’s because I don’t really feel like there’s a lot of amazing things to say that contribute directly to the dialogues and debates of the day. I used to think I had to contribute every single week to this blog on every possibly conceived news item. It got really boring. More to the point, it wasn’t as if I was getting many comments. Writing on a blog and getting a low number of comments kind of defeats the purpose and takes the wind out of your sails when it comes to posting.

So, here’s the deal: I’m going to try something different. Again. Yes, I’ve tried reinvention on this blog before. So what I’m going to do this time is go unabashedly high-end. I’m going to transform this blog, again, into a more purpose-driven forum.

I’m going to write three times a week on why a certain historical, scientific or idea has practical utility in your daily life. I’m not going to attempt to replicate Wikipedia. I’m just going to take a cue from a very smart man I paid a lot of attention to back in my youth and give it a Web 2.0 spin. I’ll take a topic and relate it to contemporary, everyday life in ways you may not expect. I have this brain of mine that has largely gone unappreciated and underused for years; I might as well put it to good use.

I don’t know if it is going to work, but it will give this blog a purpose again and will be fun for me. The operative term here is “fun,” because why else am I doing it?

So, check out the blog tomorrow for a brand new start on here. Oh, and if you don’t mind, feel free to comment so I can get a sense there’s some people reading it. Mmm-kay?


WHAT’S NEW?

August 12, 2009

Ha! Didn’t think I was coming back here, did ya?

Well, I will admit I’ve been sorely lacking in the posting department here on my blog. Life’s been a bit crazy again. This summer — aside from the profoundly crappy weather Toronto’s been having — has been a big one, full of lots of ongoings.

You know how I’ve written on here in past posts in a very contemplative, introspective fashion about my life? There’s been a point to this. If 2007 was the year it all fell down, and 2008 was the year things sunk into a black hole I had to fight like an angry dog from hell to climb out of, then 2009 has been a year of revelations and self-discoveries. I’m not going to whine and moan about how life’s been tough. Sure, it has been, but who else doesn’t go through this kind of pain at least once in their lives? Well, I know a few, actually. You’re unlucky to have lived such an unexamined life, if you can believe it. Everyone needs to face this kind of thing, I figure.

Anyway, enough of that self-righteous chatter.

MAD MEN: It’s fitting that I’m listening to Amy Winehouse’s You Know I’m No Good right now, considering it was Mad Men’s unofficial theme song to the first season back in 2007. And now… after months and months and months of waiting, Season Three starts this Sunday. My work colleague Irwin — a major fan himself — and I are watching the season premiere together. Yes, we’re major geeks. Still, after all the time I spend on the Lipp sisters’ MM site, I pretty much know the show backwards and forwards. I can actually quote entire scenes, that’s how much of a MM nerd I am. And please don’t question why I’m addicted to this show like heroin. If you know me well enough, you probably already know why.

J-SCHOOL: Here’s a link to an article on Gawker — yes, I know, it’s Gawker — about the travails of investing in a journalism degree in America in this time of total and complete implosion of the journalism industry in America (and to a lesser extent, Canada). I’d laugh, but you know. Probably in poor taste.

Alright, that’s enough for now. I’m going to get back into this regular posting thing soon. Well, as regular as I can be. I’m kind of fluttery on here, as any quasi-regular reader knows.

4CHAN: A site that I have a very complicated relationship with, 4Chan, has been profiled by Douglas Rushkoff. In case you’ve never heard of 4Chan, it’s the online location where Anonymous — the organization loosely formed around declaring war against Scientology — was founded. The best and most apt comparison I have for this kind of site is that if 4Chan was a musical genre, it would be hard-boiled, Sex Pistols-esque Punk.


ONE. MORE. MONTH.

July 14, 2009

Oh man. Today the second season DVDs come out. Here’s a review. Needless to say, it’s awesome.

And, of course, here’s the first public evidence of Season Three. I’m both excited and unnerved by what this image means…

madmen_season3


NEDA

June 23, 2009

Those eyes.

neda1

Two days after I first cast my eyes on the YouTube video that’s making waves around the world, I’m still haunted by it. Rarely is this the case for me. The raw power of the Neda video is so intense, alarming and haunting that you’d be forgiven if you can’t view it. I’ve seen it. I’m a different person now.

Those eyes.

Even now, I’m watching the video of Neda Agha-Soltan in her dying moments with an unsettled, angry, awful feeling at work.

She casts a knowing, piercing look at the camera that is recording her. I’m not sure what she was thinking at that moment, nor do I want to know. Perhaps she was wondering why she was being filmed. Or what kind of gaze she was imparting to the world when she looked into the camera. I don’t know. She glances over at us, telling us the raw horror of the moment. I can’t pretend I’ll know what that feeling is. I feel guilt for watching such a private moment.

Those eyes.

What’s happening in Iran right now is transformative in ways that are rarely understood nowadays. In the age of Facebook and Twitter, it’s undeniable that we’re facing the first Internet-led major revolution, well, ever.

But now I look upon the video of Neda — a now-global symbol that is spawning outrage across the world for the vicious, terrible death to an innocent at the hands of twisted, theocratic tyrants and their cronies in the Revolutionary Guard — and I get the power once again of what one single image, video or sound can do.

These moments in time — fleeting moments, indeed — are always brief, for they’re impossible to replicate and profound in their affectation. It’s a temporary, albeit fleeting, unmasking of a truth we’re generally afraid of facing. It’s why we look upon such devastating moments in history, sometimes, by looking away. It is profoundly uncomfortable to face this kind of truth. It’s raw truth, and history, especially in the 20th century and beyond has had a few moments like these:

capa_big_pic1

oklahoma-city-bombing

falling-man

Rest in Peace, Neda. The revolution seems to be coming in your name.

For those of you who haven’t seen this video, here’s a link (Warning: Very Graphic)


SOME WORDLE FUN

June 9, 2009

I love all the crazy artistic/linguistic visualization tools out there. One of the best ones is Wordle — it generates “word clouds” that give greater emphasis on words that appear often in your blog.

Well, here’s mine. Not sure what this says about me or my writing style, but hey, I find it kind of interesting.

gregwordle


NEED A JOB? WANT SOME APPS? HERE’S YOUR PLACE

May 27, 2009

Last night, Attack of the Show — one of my favourite shows, an ultimate geek paradise on the geekiest station — profiled two job sites that are actually worth checking out for those folks looking for work in this economy of ours (in short: the recovery’s not coming until 2010 at least, but it’s a good time for new innovations and new opportunities at least. Oh, and if you’re a blue collar worker, it might be time to consider going back to school now, as those industrial jobs aren’t coming back, possibly ever).

Indeed.ca — it’s the Google of job searching sites! This is easily the finest job searching site I’ve seen online anywhere (word to the wise: Workopolis, Monster and a few others aren’t bad sites, but they’re the online versions of the D.V.P. during rush hours — everyone’s there at the same time and all the opportunities get snagged quickly). Highly, highly recommended.

Jobserf.com — yes, it’s a site that involves paying people to find you jobs. Personally, not my cup of tea per se, but it’s a great site for people who need help finding opportunities.

Oh, and that app site I mentioned earlier…

Wakoopa.com — using the Web maxim of “goofy name, good product” to its fullest extent, this is a great, great site that aggregates all the best and newest apps online. You can write up recommendations, reviews and sample some undiscovered online gems. Really cool.